CompareAI models
- MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax
- Hy3Tencent
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M2.7 | 100/100 | 77/100 | 63/100 | 48/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Hy3 | 100/100 | 69/100 | 76/100 | 52/100 | 0/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
205K
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.13/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.53/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
87K
362K
Completed sessions
146,140
6,013,106
Token share
0.05%
1.12%
Tokens
291B-46%
7T+861,665%
JUL 23SEP 16
JUL 23SEP 16
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
67%3.1K user-weeks
71.9%3.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITMiniMax-M2.7·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeHy3 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITHy3·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902MiniMax-M2.7·Qwen3.8 Max 0902Related comparisonHy3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Hy3·Qwen3.8 Max 0902